Business Law
| Securities Act of 1933 |
|
| The Securities Act of 1933, enacted in response to the stock market crash of 1929, has been referred to as the "truth in securities" law. The Securities Act generally requires that companies selling their stock to the public must provide investors with full disclosure of material facts. More... |
|
|
| The Antitrust Exemption for Joint Newspaper Operating Arrangements |
|
| The Newspaper Preservation Act, 15 U.S.C.S. §§ 1801-1804, provides a limited exemption from antitrust laws for joint operating arrangements between newspapers in a particular locality. The objective of the legislation is to preserve independent reporting and editorial operations of the two newspapers while allowing shared production facilities that through a lowering of costs would allow both newspapers to survive. More... |
|
|
| Duty of Obedience |
|
| Most jurisdictions recognize that directors have three basic fiduciary duties: the duty of care, the duty of loyalty, and the duty of obedience. The duty of obedience requires a director to act in furtherance of the business organization's goals and mission as stated in the articles of incorporation and bylaws. More... |
|
|
| Investment Advisor Codes of Ethics |
|
| Rule 204A-1 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, adopted pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, requires implementation of codes of ethics by investment advisers. Each adviser's code of ethics must include a standard of conduct and must require compliance with federal securities laws. The codes also must require that investment adviser employees must report their personal stock transactions, and copies of the codes must be made available to clients of the investment advisor. More... |
|
|
| Degree of Culpability |
|
| Typically, directors who conduct the corporation's business must exercise the care that an ordinary prudent person would exercise in the management of his or her own affairs under similar circumstances. This "ordinary" standard of care has been adopted by a majority of states and enacted in their corporation statutes. However, courts consistently interpret the culpability standard for the duty of care as one of gross negligence. More... |
|
|